|
The product is exactly as advertised and works great. I prefer this tripod for a few extra bucks because it can get about 5-6 feet tall. Really useful.
So when i opened my package i was disspointed not because of tis looks or weight (it is indeed fairly light for the sturdiness it provides) but it was made of mostly plastic. let's say i was mildly unimpressed. I just bought this tripod to replace my aging targus. My old targus was almost completely metal disregarding the head, but i realized this tripod is extremely sturdy for a cheap plastic tripod, something my targus seemed to have failed at. This tripod is not what it is cracked up to be. after reading reviews i decided its sounded great, and after shopping around it seemed a really good deal (especially on sale). Overall its a great product if you can overlook its build material. Works great.= ] Also, this does indeed work with slr cameras and such (I use it with my sony A700 and it does just fine)
This is my second tripod and I usually use SLRs for photography. I was amazed by the quality of this tripod for an under $50 budget.I have checked out few in FRYs , Bestbuy, brands like Velbom,Sunpak.but this one is far superior to those.I would suggest this for everyone , as long as your not a pro/I am really satisfied with Amazon and Sony
It is somewhat understandable that a shipper, pressed to expedite all products, simply has become accustomed to grabbing what ever container is lying around. The item I ordered was a Sony Lightweight camera tripod. The rest of the Amazon box was stuffed with brown packing paper. Amazon may not see significant concerns over shipping mostly air but a large wasteful container like this effectively reduces the number of containers a FedEx, UPS, etc. More exhaust emissions, more fuel burned, higher related costs the consumer must bear: all of these should be of greater concern to a company known for customer support and loyalty.Perhaps this is just a consistent habit of laziness or indifference in the various shipping departments Amazon uses. I could understand double-boxing if there was a concern over fragile merchandise. The actual tripod container was 5" by 5" by 22".
In this case that was probably unnecessary since, in typical Sony fashion, the original package was very well though out and constructed. What did surprise me is that the Sony box was placed into one corner of the larger container, thus rendering double boxing useless as far as offering additional protection. I recently received another order from Amazon and have observed a somewhat disconcerting trend. There is not only the obvious impact of the wasted packaging material but the added waste of transport related expenses. One could also raise questions regarding environmental issues. truck can deliver per load. Green awareness is growing every day. Your customers are not ignorant.
It was shipped in an Amazon-labeled box that measured 12" by 18" by 24". After all it does take a time investment, albeit minimal, to fold and tape together the right size container. I should mention that something similar to what I've described here has become the norm for Amazon shipments I and others (coworkers) have received recently. Example: a person here in the last 3 months has twice received a book-sized item in a 3-plus cubic foot cardboard box.In this age of "green awareness" this practice should seem unacceptable, especially to a large omni-present retailer like Amazon. But in some situations, like this tripod order, the additional boxing was probably uncalled for.Please take some time to consider the image you wish Amazon to project. It would seem your company has an opportunity to become a highly visible leader in fast, reliable environmentally friendly merchandising but only if you wish to explore it.
It's a good tripod. Only the legs are aluminum, the rest is plastic, albeit quality plastic.As it is, it holds my Canon Xti with a somewhat heavy 24-70 F2.8 lens (lens ~ 2 lbs) without fear of dropping it, although it does get a little shaky when you extend up the center column. It's rated for 6.61 lbs max load. Somewhere better than the $20 stuff at WalMart but not quite as nice as even the lower level Manfrotto tripods - starting maybe $120 range. The little bubble level does come in useful at times.Perfectly adequate for a point-and-shoot camera and most SLR cameras without the super heavy lenses. Specs from another site puts the weight at a more reasonable 2.65 lbs - which seems about right from my estimation. for the price. The little crank on the side is not very useful either, I usually just pull the center column up or down.
If you really believed that this was a full sized but only 1 pound tripod. well, I wouldn't put my SLR on a tripod that weighs only 1 pound. and it could probably do that if the load is centered well. Good weight, reasonable quality, well priced for what it is.
|
